Current:Home > NewsMontana seeks to revive signature restrictions for ballot petitions, including on abortion rights -Prosperity Pathways
Montana seeks to revive signature restrictions for ballot petitions, including on abortion rights
View
Date:2025-04-14 01:17:29
HELENA, Mont. (AP) — Montana officials asked the state Supreme Court on Thursday for an emergency order to block a ruling that allowed signatures from inactive voters to count on petitions for several proposed November ballot initiatives, including one to protect abortion rights.
A judge said Tuesday that Montana’s Secretary of State wrongly changed election rules to reject inactive voter signatures from three ballot initiatives after the signatures had been turned in to counties and after some of the signatures had been verified.
The judge gave county election offices until July 24 to tally signatures of inactive voters that had been rejected. All the initiatives are expected to qualify even without the rejected signatures.
Two organizations sued Republican Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen when her office, in response to a question from a county election officer, said the signatures of voters who were considered “inactive” should not count toward the number of signatures needed to place initiatives on the ballot.
In granting a restraining order that blocked the change, state District Judge Michael Menahan said participation in government was a “fundamental right” that he was duty-bound to uphold. He scheduled a July 26 hearing on a permanent injunction against the state.
The groups that sued — Montanans Securing Reproductive Rights and Montanans for Election Reform — alleged the state for decades had accepted signatures of inactive voters, people who file change-of-address forms with the U.S. Postal Service and then fail to respond to county attempts to confirm their address. They can restore their active voter status by providing their address, showing up at the polls or requesting an absentee ballot.
The election reform group is asking voters to approve constitutional amendments calling for open primaries and another provision to require that candidates need a majority of the vote to win a general election.
veryGood! (1286)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Gun deaths hit their highest level ever in 2021, with 1 person dead every 11 minutes
- As ‘Tipping Point’ Nears for Cheap Solar, Doors Open to Low-Income Families
- Opioid settlement payouts are now public — and we know how much local governments got
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- Get $91 Worth of MAC Cosmetics Eye Makeup for Just $40
- The 25 Best Amazon Deals to Shop on Memorial Day 2023: Air Fryers, Luggage, Curling Irons, and More
- iCarly's Jerry Trainor Shares His Thoughts on Jennette McCurdy's Heartbreaking Memoir
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Lily-Rose Depp and 070 Shake's Romance Reaches New Heights During Airport PDA Session
Ranking
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- More brides turning to secondhand dresses as inflation drives up wedding costs
- Video: A Climate Change ‘Hackathon’ Takes Aim at New York’s Buildings
- Taylor Swift and Ice Spice's Karma Remix Is Here and It's Sweet Like Honey
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Don’t Gut Coal Ash Rules, Communities Beg EPA at Hearing
- Inside the Love Lives of the Stars of Succession
- It's time to have the 'Fat Talk' with our kids — and ourselves
Recommendation
Trump's 'stop
Brittany Cartwright Reacts to Critical Comments About Her Appearance in Mirror Selfie
Hepatitis C can be cured. So why aren't more people getting treatment?
A smarter way to use sunscreen
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
There’s No Power Grid Emergency Requiring a Coal Bailout, Regulators Say
Afghan evacuee child with terminal illness dies while in federal U.S. custody
How Pruitt’s New ‘Secret Science’ Policy Could Further Undermine Air Pollution Rules