Current:Home > FinanceMontana seeks to revive signature restrictions for ballot petitions, including on abortion rights -Prosperity Pathways
Montana seeks to revive signature restrictions for ballot petitions, including on abortion rights
View
Date:2025-04-23 14:20:33
HELENA, Mont. (AP) — Montana officials asked the state Supreme Court on Thursday for an emergency order to block a ruling that allowed signatures from inactive voters to count on petitions for several proposed November ballot initiatives, including one to protect abortion rights.
A judge said Tuesday that Montana’s Secretary of State wrongly changed election rules to reject inactive voter signatures from three ballot initiatives after the signatures had been turned in to counties and after some of the signatures had been verified.
The judge gave county election offices until July 24 to tally signatures of inactive voters that had been rejected. All the initiatives are expected to qualify even without the rejected signatures.
Two organizations sued Republican Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen when her office, in response to a question from a county election officer, said the signatures of voters who were considered “inactive” should not count toward the number of signatures needed to place initiatives on the ballot.
In granting a restraining order that blocked the change, state District Judge Michael Menahan said participation in government was a “fundamental right” that he was duty-bound to uphold. He scheduled a July 26 hearing on a permanent injunction against the state.
The groups that sued — Montanans Securing Reproductive Rights and Montanans for Election Reform — alleged the state for decades had accepted signatures of inactive voters, people who file change-of-address forms with the U.S. Postal Service and then fail to respond to county attempts to confirm their address. They can restore their active voter status by providing their address, showing up at the polls or requesting an absentee ballot.
The election reform group is asking voters to approve constitutional amendments calling for open primaries and another provision to require that candidates need a majority of the vote to win a general election.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Vietnam's human rights record is being scrutinized ahead of $15 billion climate deal
- One Uprooted Life At A Time, Climate Change Drives An American Migration
- Get Glowing Skin and Save 45% On a Complete Sunday Riley Beauty Routine
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- 'The Great Displacement' looks at communities forever altered by climate change
- Students learn lessons on climate change, pollution through raising salmon
- Olympian Simone Biles Marries Jonathan Owens in Texas Ceremony
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- 20 Mother's Day Gifts Your Wife Actually Wants
Ranking
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- New England and upstate New York brace for a winter storm
- The EPA approves California's plan to phase out diesel trucks
- Caitlyn Jenner Mourns Death of Mom Esther Jenner
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Get a $69 Deal on $155 Worth of Josie Maran Skincare Products
- Greta Thunberg's 'The Climate Book' urges world to keep climate justice out front
- Gigi Hadid’s Daughter Khai Proves She’s Next in Fashion With These Adorable Photos
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Swimming pools and lavish gardens of the rich are driving water shortages, study says
How melting Arctic ice could be fueling extreme wildfires in the Western U.S.
Mandy Moore Shows Off Her New Bangs After Itching for a Hair Change
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Proof Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling Are Still Living in a Barbie World
Global heat waves show climate change and El Niño are a bad combo
Why some Indonesians worry about a $20 billion international deal to get off coal